> I have been looking into segfault/memory leak problems and having been > thinking it was uClibc: > http://www.uclibc.org/lists/uclibc/2006-August/016100.html > Which means that some did exist and are fixed. So trying versions > after that may be safer. The 20060817 snapshot was released sometime > after that post, and uClibc is currently boasting the 20060819 > snapshot, so it should not contain the memory leak.
That email list posting seems to be about a bug in uClibc++, not uClibc. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
