ah.. I read the package management information. You may disregard this question.
-dave On Tuesday, November 14, 2006 11:19 AM, DHAJOGLO wrote: > >Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 11:19:37 -0600 >From: DHAJOGLO >To: Hardened LFS Development List <[email protected]> >Subject: removal scripts thoughts > >Hi all, > I just started a new build of hlfs (20061016). I'm working with a student > who wants a hardened linux for CDCs (cyber defense competitions). Typically, > when building these systems for the CDC, after they are stable, they strip > the system bare. Since hlfs is built with sources, a manual removal would be > necessary. For gcc in particular, would it be correct to simply remove the > installed programs/libraries listed in the contents: c++, cc (link to gcc), > cpp, g++, gcc, gccbug, and gcov, libgcc.a, libgcc_eh.a, libgcc_s.so, > libstdc++.[a,so], and libsupc++.a? Obviously, these tools are needed to > build anything for the system, but a second, development system can be used > for building while a production system could be stripped of any thing that > can be used against it. > >Further to this, would it be advantageous for the hlfs project to have removal >scripts for various packages that are optional in this respect? > >Regards, >-dave > >-- >http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev >FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ >Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
