Brian Cheeseman schreef: > Rob, > I've just done some more research and found some chatter on one of the > uClibc mailing lists where they propose a couple of solutions which is > pretty much where we have already gotten to. ie patch gettext or patch > uClibc. I also found a patch on these mailing lists to re-enable the > allocation of the 4 bytes for the pointer in the uClibc codebase and > they seem happy enough about it. > > Attached is the patch in question. it will work against 0.9.29. It > should be noted that if this patch is applied to uClibc that the > previous patch I sent around for gettext will not be needed as MUST NOT > be applied as they will conflict on the memory location of the variable. > > Cheers, > Brian. > Hi Brian,
That makes also 2 patches for uClibc. Because this patch comes from uClibc I think this is the preferred way. I am very curious what the hlfs maintainers think about this issue, but it's very quiet from that side. Considering the date it could be they are on a well deserved vacation :-) Rob -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
