On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Robert
Connolly<rob...@linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
>
> Use this:
> *cc1:
> %(cc1_cpu) %{profile:-p} -fno-stack-protector -fno-PIE
>
> *cc1plus:
> -fno-stack-protector -fno-PIE
>
> Any questions?That clears things up way better than the documentation I was able to dig up. Thanks! One quick question. Following your guidelines above would pass those two compiler options no matter what. Do you believe this to be the more prudent option going forward? Considering stack protection has made it into mainline GCC we may eventually see tests that require stack protection to be enabled. Using a check to see if the flag is present before forcing stack protection off would prevent any failures in that event. I guess the question should be do you think we will ever see tests that require stack protection? Robert Baker -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
