On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Brandon Zylstra <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hey Scott,
> any reason you want to use Webrick?
>
Actually, I don't want to use Webrick. I just noticed this while
provisioning some machines and thought it was a little odd. Even though
Webrick is junk, it seems like Hobo should still be happy to work with it.
(And would it be fairly easy for you to add the has_lifecycle? method to
> WEBrick::Log::Class?)
>
I haven't looked. But this seems a fairly odd thing to do, no? What does
WEBrick::Log::Class have to do with lifecycles? (Maybe it's not as odd as I
thought?)
- Scott
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo
Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
