There's no specific "tag_missing" feature, but I'm sure you could make it work. You'd have to look at the source to figure out what class to add the method missing to.
Tom On 8 Apr 2009, at 07:24, Mike Hogan wrote: > > Hi all, > > I am attempting to use DRYML to generate HTML that is consumed by an > automated acceptance testing tool - http://www.concordion.org > specifically. So my DRYML markup ends up specifying data some times, > a bit like this: > > <insert-order> > <set name="received-date">6-4-2009</set> > <set name="from">Mike Hogan</set> > <set name="total-cost">34.76</set> > > ... > > </insert-order> > > And I can make this work. But personally I would prefer to be able to > do : > > <insert-order> > <received-date>6-4-2009</received-date> > <from>Mike Hogan</from> > <total-cost>34.76</total-cost> > </insert-order> > > I think this will be easier to sell to our testers and business > analysts (but I may be wrong). > > Anyway, to pull this off, I need to define tags for received-data, > from, total-cost etc. One tag for each of the possible properties of > an order. And then when I include all the other kinds of domain > objects, and their many properties, that might need to be specified in > a test case, it becomes impractical to define and maintain all these > property-setting tags. > > So I was wondering it there was room for some cool way to use the > method_missing idea and apply it to DRYML tags. So if <received-date> > is intercepted, I can know that i need to set the associated property > on the current object. Or something along these lines :-) > > What ya reckon? > > Thanks all, > Mike. > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
