Yes, but include what? A better way might be to leverage the new (well, fairly new - was it in 2.2?) syntax for accessing fields of join tables. So the example below would be:
set_default_order :custodian => :name --Matt Jones On May 29, 2009, at 6:27 PM, Owen wrote: > > I think that is a good idea. Others? > > > -Owen > > On May 27, 5:06 pm, Montgomery Kosma <[email protected]> wrote: >> I have Collection object which belongs_to Custodian. I'd like my >> Collections to be grouped or ordered by custodian.name. >> >> In vanilla rails, this works: >> >> Collection.all(:include => :custodian, :order => "custodians.name") >> >> Absent the :include option, I get an "unknown column >> custodians.name" (not sure why custodians has to be plural ...). >> >> I get the same error in Hobo if I my Collection class specifies: >> >> set_default_order "custodians.name" >> >> I think the fix is to add the :include option to the default find >> behavior. Any way in Hobo to do that? If not, should there be? > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
