Boy, I thought we had laid this to rest a while ago. : - ) On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 3:50 PM, kevinpfromnm <[email protected]> wrote:
> the not working with virtual columns refers to automatic methods. you > can always roll your own so to speak. in this case, it's really just > a controller tweak to change how it grabs the records to include an > order_by or use a specific named_scope. > > On May 3, 10:45 am, storitel <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm working on pretty much the same thing... but without your 18 > > months' rails experience :-) > > > > afaik table-plus sort only works for columns of the model that's in > > context - so for example in mine... > > > > <table-plus fields="user, contact.company.name, this, > > probability, created_at, start_date, state"> > > > > i can sort all the lead fields, but not contact.company.name > > > > I can suggest a couple of workarounds... > > > > 1 - make a table-plus of the taskassignments rather than the leads, > > and then you can sort that by due date > > 2 - add a due_date column to your leads model and put in logic to > > update it with due date from the task (but i guess this could get > > messy) > > > > i hope this helps > > paul > > > > On 3 May, 17:29, Joe Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello HoboUsers! > > > > > I've got about 18 months of Rails experience under my belt and I was > > > recently delighted to discover Hobo! I'm using it to develop a simple > > > CRM application to manage a client's sales pipeline. One of their > > > feature requests was to include a way to give each task in the > > > pipeline a due date and then be able to sort the leads by the next due > > > date. I've created a due_date field in the TaskAssignment table and I > > > have a function in my Lead model named next_task which returns the > > > next task for that lead. Unfortunately, I can't get the Table-Plus > > > dryml tag to sort that field. > > > > > I believe that at this point Hobo doesn't support sorting with virtual > > > attributes. Is that correct? What about the included search > > > functionality. Will that work with virtual attributes? More > > > importantly, do any of you smarties out there have a suggestion for > > > how I could implement this feature differently to achieve my desired > > > results? > > > > > Thanks guys! > > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Hobo Users" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<hobousers%[email protected]> > . > > > For more options, visit this group athttp:// > groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en. > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Hobo Users" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<hobousers%[email protected]> > . > > For more options, visit this group athttp:// > groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Hobo Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<hobousers%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en. > > -- Thanks, - Owen Owen Dall, Chief Systems Architect Barquin International Cell: 410-991-0811 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en.
