there's also index_action_for for custom owned index actions. you have to add :params => [:param1,param2...] if you haven't already. Lifecycles should add those fields to the form automatically too.
On May 27, 1:29 pm, Chris Apolzon <[email protected]> wrote: > Awesome! Nothing better than a project developer participating in the > community. > > I have run into another issue with lifecycles tho. I have a creator > (:assign) and I would like it to feel like the new form. However, even if I > update the assign-form to include title etc in the field-list the title is > never saved. I also tried using this.title but that results in a missing > editable_by? method. I even inspected the dom ids and they are the same on > the two forms. > > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Matt Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Chris Apolzon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Not a horrible solution. My custom actions were really more like > > filters, > > > so I ended up amending the hobo index action to apply a filter from > > > params[:state] > > > > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:34 PM, kevinpfromnm <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > >> Given your troubles, you might want to remove the automatic hobo > > >> routes and manually specify them. A little ugly but will let you > > >> specify the order of routing exactly. > > > >> On May 27, 10:05 am, Chris Apolzon <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > So....I'm really having trouble with this. If I try flip-flopping the > > >> > route > > >> > declarations, I either get errors from dryml (<index-page/>) because > > the > > >> > path methods/variables are missing or the route is misinterpreted as a > > >> > show > > >> > route (with an id of 'received' -- my custom route). This has all led > > >> > me to > > >> > read the model_router.rb file in the Hobo gem. The comment regarding > > >> > ticket > > >> > #251 for disambiguating nil ids (and #252 which is marked wontfix). > > Is > > >> > this > > >> > likely related or am I barking up the wrong tree? > > > >> > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Chris Apolzon <[email protected]> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > Quick follow-up: Yes, this workaround does break all the existing > > >> > > chris# > > >> > > routes so I would love to hear how to declare the lifecycle routes > > >> > > manually. > > > >> > > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Chris Apolzon <[email protected]> > > >> > > wrote: > > > >> > >> As it turns out, if you try to define some custom routes for a > > model > > >> > >> with a lifecycle: > > > >> > >> map.resources :manuscripts, :collection => { :chris1 => :get, > > >> > >> :chris2 => :get, > > >> > >> :chris3 => :get, > > >> > >> :chris4 => :get, > > >> > >> :chris5 => :get > > >> > >> } > > > Apologies for not getting back sooner. The easiest way to get actions > > like this added to the routes is to declare the actions with > > index_action in the controller: > > > def chris1 > > ... > > end > > > becomes: > > > index_action :chris1 do > > ... > > end > > > --Matt Jones > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Hobo Users" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<hobousers%[email protected]> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en.
