Hello, I guess it doesn't matter if the first-time compile takes some time, it always have someway to optimize that. but the problem is the common-case of performance, when the site is up and running, the performance of it. I'm developing a internet application, expecting a user raise, so a 'low traffic sites' description really doesn't fit in me:)
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 4:02 AM, Betelgeuse <[email protected]> wrote: > Dryml is much slower than ERB. Like the original poster said it's not > uncommon to see hundreds of milliseconds. I don't think this is a > problem for low traffic sites. For high traffic sites you probably > have resources to optimize dryml a little :) In development (and > production but you restart less often) on the first page load one must > factor in the time for dryml to compile. On my core i7 it takes DRYML: > Compiled app/views/taglibs/application.dryml in 1.55s . You won't see > this hit on subsequent page loads. > > On Aug 1, 3:16 am, storitel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > as far as i know hobo production speed is approximately the same as > > rails production speed. > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Hobo Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<hobousers%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en. > > -- http://hi.baidu.com/femto -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en.
