Good strategy. Thanks, Tiago. -Owen
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 6:58 AM, Tiago Franco <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > So what should be the next steps? > > 1 - Document the way STI currently works on Hobo's Cookbook > 2 - Identify how it should work for the next release (we may have some > discussion around this) > 3 - Try ( :) ) to implement the fix > 4 - Iterate again on the documentation > > Makes sense? > > Thanks, > TF > > > On 08/15/2010 09:15 PM, Betelgeuse wrote: > >> Especially this is something that many people are likely to hit as >> it's >> not documented any where. I think it would help for the manual to have >> something about how you are able to use STI with Hobo. It's not indeed >> totally broken if you make a separate controller for each subclass but >> that is not an optimal solution for all use cases. >> >> On Aug 15, 9:46 pm, Matt Jones<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> - superclass chaining is not reliably implemented, so you can't rely on >>> (for instance) declaring a model_controller for the parent class and having >>> object_url work correctly for subclasses. >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Hobo Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<hobousers%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en. > > -- - Owen Owen Dall, Chief Systems Architect Barquin International Cell: 410-991-0811 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en.
