Interesting... However, without the following ...
acting_user == owner || !owner_changed? The add contact select-many would not show up on the new invitation form. Even just removing !owner_changed? removes the select-many ... and if I substitute "owner_is? acting_user" for "acting_user == owner", that also would cause a similar issue where the select-many isn't shown. Either way, glad to have it working now !! Now, what I'd really like to be able to do is have some fancy ajax that takes the "address" of the first Contact added to the New Invitation form, and puts that address in the "address" text field of the new Invitation :-) .... I'm sure it can be done, but it'll likely take me a while to figure that one out. I assume I'll have to extend <select-many> and go from there ? On Oct 26, 5:27 pm, kevinpfromnm <[email protected]> wrote: > The owner_changed? only makes sense on the update permission check. As is, > it might cause weird permissions problems to have that on other checks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en.
