OK, tried this. I see what you mean. There is a relationship; I just didn't want to expose it.
It's taken some fiddling, but I think I've now removed the way to go from the one to the many - which was what I was really after. Thanks for the guidance, JeremyC On Jan 10, 3:01 pm, Bob Sleys <[email protected]> wrote: > Use a belongs_to relationship. Sounds like a one-to-many to me. Even > though you aren't going from the direction of the many to one it still > exists. > > Bob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en.
