I belive you can do a collection inside another collection.
IE something like
<collection:ips>
<view:users>
<collection/>
</view:users>
</collection:ips>
On Friday, March 9, 2012 10:20:12 AM UTC-5, Scorpio wrote:
>
> Hmmm the scope may indeed solve the collection problem but how do I
> integrate it with a page that already has another collection?
>
> On Mar 9, 3:56 pm, Bob Sleys <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Have you though about using a scope and sql to do all this for you? I
> do
> > something similar but not quite as complex but I would thing you could
> use
> > sql to aggregate the numbers you need.
> >
> > Here is where I find all materials that are loaded for a building. This
> is
> > in the materials model and I pass to it in controller where a need a
> > collection of all building materials the building I'm interested in ie
> > @building_materials = Material.for_building(@material.building)
> >
> > scope :for_building, lambda { |b|
> > where("building_id = ?", b.id).
> > order(:name)
> > }
> >
> > Bob
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Friday, March 9, 2012 9:44:30 AM UTC-5, Scorpio wrote:
> >
> > > I'm almost done fighting with my logging model and i've got an IP
> > > details page where a collection if filtered as follows
> >
> > > def ip
> > > self.this = IpLog.where(:logged_ip => params[:ip])
> > > end
> >
> > > I've created a custom collection that shows the dates actions and all
> > > the stuff I need just the way I need it but above that collection I'd
> > > like to have something like a subsection "Users that have logged in
> > > with this ip" (not spot on English but you get what I mean hopefully)
> >
> > > Idealy I'd like there to be 4 columns in that subsection
> >
> > > Name | Last Login| First Login | Number of times logged in
> >
> > > technically the base collection already has that info as it has every
> > > action from that ip so I just kinda need to filter this base
> > > collection and count it. I know how to do a rails count but filtering
> > > in a collection tag _ABOVE_the base collection while keeping the base
> > > intact is a problem. So is counting with Hobo (Man... that sounds like
> > > a kids book "Counting with Hobo" nvm- off-topic ). I'm concerned about
> > > filtering so that it keeps the good data below the secondary
> > > collection as it is.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo
Users" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/hobousers/-/vc6APqDL1JMJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en.
