The box can be upgraded to a point deep blue so it should be ok as I can scale the hell out of it if I run into performance issues. I'm not quite sure about those separate unix users as in the long run I'd like it to be viable to pay for itself thus would need to be resold. First things first. Needs to run
On Mar 28, 4:01 pm, Matt Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mar 28, 2012, at 7:58 AM, Scorpio wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi there, I've ran into a bit of emergency with the host that I'm > > using and because of that I need to setup a vps ASAP. > > > There are a lot of guides out there but all of em seem to be setting > > up one-app servers. I'd like to use nginx, unicorn (performance charts > > rook promising ) for rails and also get php support working. I've been > > digging around google for quite some time now. It seems it's as I said > > either one-app configs or very outdated (2007-ish). I know it's kinda > > not strictly a hobo question but maybe someone out there has a set of > > links I can use or a way to organize all that info in a way that's > > usable. I haven't got enough experience to mix rails and php. > > > I'd prefer the above mentioned stack but I'm in such a hurry that > > anything working is good enough. I can setup a config for rails that > > makes going to an ip address hit one selected site but that's it. No > > php or multi-app. I'd need help adding php to something like that and > > than adding something like rails_apps/#{appname} (Cpanel style) and > > php_apps/3{appname} to keep things nicely separate. I've got all the > > required domains and such from the old server configs. I did my > > homework based of webmin I'm just not sure how the above changes will > > impact the installation process I know. > > Would lean towards an Apache / Passenger stack for this, since the PHP > support is baked-in. I'd recommend keeping each application as a separate > Unix user, as it will help avoid cross-app security breaches. Check out the > Apache documentation for vhosts: > > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/vhosts/examples.html > > and the Passenger docs: > > http://www.modrails.com/documentation/Users%20guide%20Apache.html > > Nginx and unicorn are definitely regarded as quicker, but if performance is a > major concern you shouldn't be serving multiple apps from one box. > > --Matt Jones -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en.
