I don't want you to leave, but if the only thing that you are using is lifecycles, that's a lot of stuff to bring along for the ride. I wish we had Hobo better split up so that you could avoid loading the DRYML gem and many other things, but we don't.
Your idea about the generators is definitely interesting. HoboFields' rich type system definitely can be useful for something like Joosy. However, Hobo's a pretty big system. If you're thinking of going down that route, I'd probably try and create a separate gem/plugin, stealing code from Hobo and using it as an example instead of converting it. Bryan On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Gert Thiel <[email protected]> wrote: > So, you're recommend to get rid of all Hobo? ;-) > > I considered how to integrate Hobo and Joosy by re-factoring the > generators to output Joosy related code instead of DRYML taglibs. > > But if you prefer me to leave Hobo-land … > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Hobo Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en.
