Hmmm, that looks like fairly deliberate ordering. I imagine that Tom placed the user_becomes logic before the permission check because the use case he had in mind was the nobody -> somebody transition. In that case it makes sense to run the permission check against the somebody. OTOH, in the case of a Jack -> Jill transition, it probably makes more sense to to the check against Jack.
Matt, do you have an opinion on this one? Bryan On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Gert Thiel <[email protected]> wrote: > see https://gist.github.com/4110320 which includes my patch > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Hobo Users" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/hobousers/-/Lf9s66uRQJQJ. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en.
