Nice work Tim. I have merged your PRs and will update the website ASAP.

Regards,
Ignacio

El 29/03/14 17:46, Tim Griffin escribió:
> I'm posting this as a reference for other users, and will submit a pull
> request for the docs. 
> 
> I've discovered that if you have repeated transitions in a lifecycle,
> the FIRST variation of a specific transition dictates whether /params/
> will be available for subsequent versions of the /same/ transition. 
> 
> For example: Given these two variations of a transition (available to
> different users), the [:comments] param on the second variation is
> actually NOT available to the transition. 
> 
>     transition :reject, {:submitted => :rejected},  
>       :available_to => 'acting_user if (acting_user.administrator? ||
> acting_user.officer?)' do 
> 
>     transition :reject, {:in_review => :rejected}, :params => [:comments], 
>       :available_to => 'acting_user if (acting_user.administrator?)' do 
> 
> For the second variation to support the param, it needs to be listed
> first in the lifecycle, as follows:
> 
>     transition :reject, {:in_review => :rejected}, :params => [:comments], 
>       :available_to => 'acting_user if (acting_user.administrator?)' do 
> 
>     transition :reject, {:submitted => :rejected},  
>       :available_to => 'acting_user if (acting_user.administrator? ||
> acting_user.officer?)' do 
> 
> In my case, I was depending on the :comments field to appear within a
> form as follows:
> 
>       <call-tag tag="#{transition}-form">
>         <field-list:>
>           <comments-view:>
>             <text-area class="no-ckeditor"/>
>           </comments-view:>
>         </field-list:>
>         <actions: replace></actions:>
>       </call-tag>
> 
> but it will only appear if it's listed on the first variation. 
> 
> 
> Alternatively, if these two variations of the transition were made
> available to the same users, their ":from" transitions could be combined
> in an array:
> 
>     transition :reject, { [:submitted, :in_review] =>
> :rejected}, :params => [:comments], 
>       :available_to => 'acting_user if (acting_user.administrator? ||
> acting_user.officer?)' do 
> 
> 
> A subtle anomaly that tripped me up briefly.
> 
> Tim
> 
> 
> Tim
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Hobo Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to