On 2017-05-02 20:09, michael.norr...@data61.csiro.au wrote: > Well, as I said, I think it’s quite possible that we don’t need to > know this any more. Before polyc was provided, we needed to provide > explicit -L paths so that the linker could look in the right places > when building executables like Holmake. All this is now handled by > polyc I think.
Is there a way to ask polyc for this information? If not, maybe there should be? -- Please *no* private Cc: on mailing lists and newsgroups Personal signed mail: please _encrypt_ and sign Don't clear-text sign: http://primate.net/~itz/blog/the-problem-with-gpg-signatures.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ hol-info mailing list hol-info@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hol-info
