Thanks Chun and Ramana.

On 11/09/17 06:26, Chun Tian (binghe) wrote:
> Well .. I didn’t reply to the mailing list because it contains some insulting 
> words to third-party products. But since you forwarded it already, I’m fine 
> with that.

Oops. I am sorry for that.

> I didn’t know you were looking for formalizations of pure mathematics 
> theories, but here is my another little experience: […]

I see. Good idea.

> The only sad thing is, this web site didn’t mention any work done in HOL4 
> (and its predecessors). While the closest one is HOL light, of course. I 
> think migrating theories to HOL4 from other theorem provers is not always 
> straightforward but still doesn’t create much academic value, unless you can 
> push the related theories to a higher level.

I agree.

-- 
Do not eat animals; respect them as you respect people.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=how+to+(become+OR+eat)+vegan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
hol-info mailing list
hol-info@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hol-info

Reply via email to