Thank you! 

> On Jul 6, 2018, at 1:04 PM, Mario Xerxes Castelán Castro 
> <marioxcc...@yandex.com> wrote:
> 
> This is eta conversion. It is handled in HOL4 by the simplifier and both
> HOL4 and HOL Light have conversions called “ETA_CONV” that are more low
> level.
> 
> On 06/07/18 12:01, Dylan Melville wrote:
>> Is there a tactical that shows that a term is equal to the same term with an 
>> added abstraction, for example:
>> 
>> |- ( f:(num->bool) ) n <=> (\x:num. f:(num->bool) ) n
>> 
>> Or even more simply
>> 
>> |- f:(num->bool) <=> (\x:num. f:(num->bool) )
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> _______________________________________________
>> hol-info mailing list
>> hol-info@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hol-info
>> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! 
> http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________
> hol-info mailing list
> hol-info@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hol-info


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
hol-info mailing list
hol-info@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hol-info

Reply via email to