Hi Ray, I don't agree with the statement: "However we must also work on the bigger picture before getting rat-holed too much into implementation details."
I found the discussion on routing protocols very relevant. I hope the group can also review/revise the architecture at the same time. Don On 8/5/11 7:57 AM, "Ray Bellis" <[email protected]> wrote: >We currently have draft-arkko-townsley-homenet-arch-00 as a candidate for >our first chartered WG item. > >To ensure we can maintain some inertia following our session in Quebec, >it would be appreciated if members could review this document. > >I'd especially like to see some feedback on ยง3.2 "Principles" since I get >the impression that some of those may be quite contentious. > >The discussion on LAN-side routing is interesting and I'm happy to see >that continue. However we must also work on the bigger picture before >getting rat-holed too much into implementation details. > >Ray Bellis >Homenet co-chair > >_______________________________________________ >homenet mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
