On 9/11/11 7:32 PM, "Wouter Cloetens" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 10/09/11 19:24, Brzozowski, John wrote: >> My IPv6 DNS is currently forwarding to my service providers recursive >>DNS >> servers or some other server on the Internet. >> >> >> My local IPv4 DNS server privately addressed and will forward for any >> request it is not authoritative for, which works fine. >> >> I am going to change the setup so that the RFC5006 DNS server IPv6 >>address >> and the IPv4 DNS server addresses are the same server. This server will >> have forwarding statements for the internal zones to the internal DNS >> server. I imagine this will iron things out. Alternatively if the IPv4 >> local DNS servers were also IPv6 transport enabled I could just use it, >> however, this is not the case. > >Indeed. This works fine in the setup I made for my company. Public >lookups go upstream through my provider's IPv6 DNS server, local lookups >go through the intranet's DNS server. Local lookups are defined as >*.company.com and all the private IPv4 subnets. The IPv6 DNS server >itself is authoritative for IPv6 until we merge the two some day. [jjmb] Interesting, certainly not the case for me. The resolver never tries a different DNS server once it gets responses from the IPv6. Just confirming, the DNS server (IPv6 transport) is authoritative for *.company.com right? If yes, this would explain why it works for you. > >> The last scenario you describe below is indeed another case that >>requires >> attention. I have been doing this for years as such I have had to >> manually managed two separate DNS systems. One that is authoritative >> globally on the Internet and one that is locally managed. > >One might think there's a need to merge those... > >> One thing to note, while both of the above are reasonable for the >>average >> engineer to tackle it is unlikely that a lay person would know how to >> manage these situations. > >One might think the situation would improve if dual-stack RGW's were to >have dual-stack DNS servers embedded in them... [jjmb] this is one way to address the matter. > >bfn, Wouter >-- >Architect Core Gateway SoftAtHome R&D RGW http://www.softathome.com/ >http://www.linkedin.com/in/wcloetens Vaartdijk 3/B701, B-3018 Wijgmaal >Tel: +32-16-852010 Mobile: +32-492-277790 Fax: +32-16-852099 > >This message and any attachments are confidential, intended solely for >the addressees and are SoftAtHome¹s ownership. >Any unauthorized use or dissemination is prohibited. If you are not the >intended addressee of this message, please cancel it immediately and >inform the sender. _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
