On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 16:18, Erik Nordmark <[email protected]> wrote:
> Today there are IPv4 NATting RGs, and there are cases when you end up with >> multiple (could be tied to separate services or other functionality) in a >> home. >> > Seems like we'd like to be able to introduce IPv6 support without NATs into > such a home network without breaking IPv4. > This approach doesn't break IPv4, but it will work regardless of whether IPv4 is working or not. So if/when IPv4 goes away you can plug any port into any other port, even in topologies that IPv4+NAT can't handle, and it will still work. I don't think "doesn't work if IPv4 doesn't work" should be a goal. > > You seem to focus on a clean slate approach. More than clean slate it's ships in the night. In your view, if there is a single prefix assigned to the home by the ISP, > and there are three routers connected to a particular link in the home, > would each of those three routers assign a different prefix to the link? No, the intention is that there be only one prefix on the link.
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
