> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > james > woodyatt > Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 11:07 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [homenet] Homenet Architecture & Interim Meeting > > On Oct 10, 2011, at 19:45 , Curtis Villamizar wrote: > > > > All of this is only true for IPv4 but not for IPv6. > > I wasn't talking about IPv4 at all. My comments are relevant in a world > entirely comprising > IPv6-only service providers. The IPv6 Internet will be saddled with all of > the problems of > the IPv4 Internet with respect to devices on homenets having to beg the > gateways to allow > inbound packets from arbitrary remote destinations. It has nothing to do > with NAT, and > everything to do with firewalls and stateful filters.
s/beg/authorize > > > -- > james woodyatt <[email protected]> > member of technical staff, core os networking > > > > _______________________________________________ > homenet mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout. _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
