On 2 Mar 2012, at 11:21, <[email protected]> <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think the idea works for both IPv4 with NAT and IPv6. > > Does the idea work for homenet WG? > Or already discussed ? > > If the idea is valuable, I will write a draft and sample DNS server. Fujiwara-san Thanks for your note. The idea of running a local authoritative zone alongside a forwarding proxy or full recursive server has been seen already, for example in the "dnsmasq" software used by many CPE vendors. It is also listed as requirement LAN.DNS.6 in the Broadband Forum's TR-124 Issue 2. As such a draft describing this is probably unnecessary. Your DNS expertise would of course be much appreciated as we start to tackle the wider issues around naming in the Homenet, specifically: 1. naming updates and queries between subnets 2. integration (or otherwise) of unicast DNS and mDNS 3. DNSSEC validation kind regards, Ray _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
