On 2012-03-15 11:48, Tim Chown wrote:
> On 14 Mar 2012, at 22:31, Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
>> On 2012-03-15 10:36, Dave Taht wrote:
>> ...
>>> For reference, this is how to configure bind9 to not leak a private
>>> .lan or .whatever to the roots.
>> .lan isn't a very good choice IMHO, since it does not imply multiple
>> segments and routing.
> 
> We should really make this work transparently for the user, so the choice is 
> not important.  They should grasp that devices in their homenet must have 
> unique names within that network, but not be exposed to the .lan, .site, 
> .home or .dave domain used wherever possible.

I fully agree; just let's choose something that is neutral and simple when users
do happen to see it.

   Brian
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to