I should think we could combine forces. The -00 also proposed a way to use DHCP/DHCPv6 within the home, and the working group didn't like it (an option on the RA). If the working group likes yours, then it's an obvious fit.
On Mar 21, 2012, at 12:01 AM, Chris Grundemann wrote: > Hi Ralph, > > Thanks for the pointer. I had previously read > draft-baker-homenet-prefix-assignment-00 but had not yet seen the -01. I > just read through it again in depth and I agree that we are describing > similar technology. It appears that draft-baker covers the high-level > "home networks could use DHCPv6" while draft-gmann takes a "here's how to > make DHCPv6 Relay work in home networks." If that's a correct observation, > perhaps we should combine forces to document the mechanisms more > completely? I think we could find a way to merge the detailed procedure > and requirements for using DHCPv6 relay from draft-gmann into draft-baker. > The next step would likely be to add detailed steps for using unicast > DHCPv6. > > Thoughts? > > ~Chris > > PS - I unfortunately will not be in Paris next week but Chris Donley will > be and I'm sure he'd be happy to talk this through a bit more if you > and/or Fred are amenable and available. > > > On 3/15/12 12:21 PM, "Ralph Droms" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Chris - you might want to take a look at >> draft-baker-homenet-prefix-assignment-01, which describes similar >> technology (if I'm understanding your document correctly). >> >> - Ralph >> > > _______________________________________________ > homenet mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
