>>>>> "Jeffrey" == Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]> writes: Jeffrey> [I'm subscribed to the list but far behind. This was Jeffrey> prompted by a question to Acee at the mic at rtgwg.]
Jeffrey> Let's say my Mother has two internet providers, A and B.
Jeffrey> The reason may be because she needs provider A for home
Jeffrey> work, but it's a somewhat filtered network (she can't get
Jeffrey> to her facebook!) and has B as her personal provider.
A good example, particularly if "A" is really a virtual wire.
But, my question is: on provider A, will she have full access, or only
access to work?
Jeffrey> Instead of source routing, I can also see standard routing
Jeffrey> being done. Presume 192.0.2/24 is where the work-related
Jeffrey> resources are. A static route configured on the gateway
Jeffrey> for A and advertised into the routing protocol would be
Jeffrey> sufficient to sink work traffic to the right router.
so, this is what we have been calling a walled-garden, but perhaps that
term is too confusing due to WAP-type usage a decade ago, and we need
another term.
--
] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
then sign the petition.
pgp4NNiV0AH5m.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
