>>>>> "Ted" == Ted Lemon <[email protected]> writes:
>> Whether this is fixed by ensuring proper delegation or by a proxy
>> that gives the right answer quickly, IMO a reverse DNS local to
>> the homenet is useful.
Ted> Reminder: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lemon-dhc-dns-pd-00
Ted> addresses this precise issue in a way that does not require
Ted> every homenet to manage its own reverse delegation, but allows
Ted> homenets to be configured in such a way that they can negotiate
Ted, I read your document this morning (it was on my list...)
and I love your document. Great!
Does it get adopted by DHC or HOMENET WG?
I think I didn't get to the end of it this morning on the bus, but if
homenet uses PD to delegate prefixes within the home, do you see any
reason why subnets for the different parts of the home(net) couldn't
have reverse DNS delegated too?
(I think there are reasons why some networks probably *shouldn't* do
this, probably not by default either, but I can see a number of
situations where it would be useful. One use case might be Fred's house
network, with the two SOHOs...)
--
] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
then sign the petition.
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
