On Jun 29, 2012, at 11:27 , Michael Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > > Maybe I can add some fuel to Olafur's fire. I'd like to say that the homenet > name service MUST be DNS.
Let's go further. Let's say that it must be DNS-Based Service Discovery [I-D.cheshire-dnsext-dns-sd], which has been in the RFC Editor Queue for 199 days at this point, so one imagines that it stands a decent chance of being a published RFC by the time HOMENET finishes its first round of major work. -- james woodyatt <[email protected]> member of technical staff, core os networking [*] <http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cheshire-dnsext-dns-sd/> _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
