On 7/30/12 3:16 PM, "Michael Richardson" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>> "Ray" == Ray Bellis <[email protected]> writes: > Ray> <nohat> > > Ray> Could you explain _why_ you consider it more pressing? > > Ray> As I understand it, the consensus in groups such as DNSOP is > Ray> that there's no need for reverse DNS for end-user IPv6 hosts. > >I'm not interested in re-opening this debate. >Yeah, the DNS people don't see a need. >Application people and security people *do* see a need. Who? I've heard a lot of people say, "Them," but I've never heard anyone say, "Me." Lee This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout. _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
