I think that this research is bang: the reason we couldn't do
Opportunistic Encryption (RFC4322) was because we had no identity, not
even local identity.
(The fact that reverse DNS was hard to get control of was a clue
to this.  The fact that NAT makes reverse DNS ambiguous was just
an additional complexity, but for many it seemed like the initial
complexity) 

>>>>> "Brian" == Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> writes:
    Brian> All this talk about tunnels and names made me think that people
    Brian> might be interested in the Signpost project, mainly based at
    Brian> the Computer Lab in Cambridge where I am currently a visitor.
    Brian> I think this project is a proof of concept for ideas being
    Brian> discussed here.

    Brian> http://conferences.sigcomm.org/sigcomm/2012/paper/sigcomm/p83.pdf

    Brian> (10MB file) 
http://conferences.npl.co.uk/satin/presentations/satin2012slides-Madhavapeddy.pdf

-- 
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works 

Attachment: pgpJzEyu6Yaip.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to