I agree with Lorenzo Colitti, Ted Lemon, James Woodyatt, and
various others about the adverse operational impacts of using
NPT66.
So I also agree that the Home Net Architecture document (and
any other applicable Home Net documents) ought to clearly
indicate that NPT66 is NOT part of the HomeNet Architecture
and is NOT a recommended approach.
It might be useful for James Woodyatt's notes about these
technical issues to get written up as an Informational RFC,
to help document the technical issues/operational issues
for any new participants here (and more generally for IETF
newcomers who might not immediately grasp the issues).
Yours,
Ran
PS: Yes, I understand this won't stop a vendor from shipping
NPT66, but we can at least make it clear that NPT66 has
significant technical limitations and unresolved issues,
so is NOT part of the Home Net solution set.
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
