> From: Michael Richardson <[email protected]> > fujiwara> I submitted draft-fujiwara-smallest-homenet-01 > fujiwara> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-fujiwara-smallest-homenet-01.txt > > fujiwara> Although access control for home servers is very important, > fujiwara> managements and setups of access controls are difficult for > most of > fujiwara> users. "Connecting a new node to the same link" is > fujiwara> easiest way of > fujiwara> access control. One of solutions is to use link-local > fujiwara> addresses for > fujiwara> communications of clients and servers. > > fujiwara> Is it in a scope of homenet WG ? > fujiwara> Does anyone have interests for the idea ? > > It seems to me like it's already an accepted part of the homenet arch. > There will be ULAs and GUAs, and ULAs will be preferred for local > communication.
Thanks. What I would like to say is that - Access control in homenet servers is important - There are no/few experts in many homenets. - Easy configuration is required for homenet servers. # For example, link based access control. My idea is that by using Link-local address positively, the communication in a link and the communication to the Internet can be separated, and a design becomes easy. (We don't need new protocols.) After submitting this draft, I considered new idea to set default ACL as the same net (/64) of servers. -- Kazunori Fujiwara, JPRS <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
