>>>>> "Mattia" == Mattia Rossi <[email protected]> writes: Mattia> might become:
Mattia> The home network needs to be adaptable to such ISP
Mattia> policies, and thus make no assumptions about the stability
Mattia> of the prefix received from an ISP, or the length of the
Mattia> prefix that may be offered. However, if only a /64 is
Mattia> offered by the ISP, the homenet may be severely
Mattia> constrained. Attempting to use subnet prefixes longer than
Mattia> /64 would break SLAAC, and is thus not recommended. Using
Mattia> ULA prefixes internally with NPTv6 at the boundary would be
Mattia> possible, but is not recommended for reasons given
Mattia> elsewhere. The least damaging solution would be for the
Mattia> internal routers to revert to bridging mode, even though
Mattia> this would destroy the benefits of subnetting. There are
I am opposed to this text.
Mattia> cases where neither bridging mode nor NPTv6, nor DHCPv6 are
Mattia> feasible, e.g. if there are LLN subnets within the homenet
Mattia> which require remote access. In such cases a /64 assignment
Mattia> from an ISP will break the home network, and should
Mattia> therefore be avoided.
please remember that multicast is hostile to plain wifi, and regularly
breaks it, if you bridge wired to wireless.
--
Michael Richardson
-on the road-
pgp6i99IQjO0G.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
