On 21/02/2013 19:23, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
...
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-flowlabel-routing
>> "Using IS-IS with Role-Based Access Control", Fred Baker, 17-Feb-13
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-routing
>> "IPv6 Source/Destination Routing using IS-IS", Fred Baker, 17-Feb-13
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-ipv6-ospf-dst-flowlabel-routing
>> "Using OSPFv3 with Role-Based Access Control", Fred Baker, 17-Feb-13
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-ipv6-ospf-dst-src-routing
>> "IPv6 Source/Destination Routing using OSPFv3", Fred Baker, 17-Feb-13
To get this on the record, I have serious doubts whether the use
of the flow label suggested in these drafts is compatible with
the current flow label standard (RFC6437). I think this is
separable from the general approach, so I'd rather defer
discussion until the general approach has been debated.
Brian
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
