I have to agree kudos to Simon for trying to move something forward and the something pertains to real problems that we must solve. While I recognize that is not in the HOMENET charter I do not agree that this should be IPv6 only.
========================================= John Jason Brzozowski Comcast Cable m) 484-962-0060 e) [email protected] o) 609-377-6594 w) www.comcast6.net ========================================= -----Original Message----- From: Ted Lemon <[email protected]> Date: Friday, February 22, 2013 11:44 AM To: Michael Thomas <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Mark Townsley <[email protected]>, Dave Taht <[email protected]>, Jari Arkko <[email protected]>, John Jason Brzozowski <[email protected]>, "[email protected] Group" <[email protected]>, David Lamparter <[email protected]>, Lorenzo Colitti <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [homenet] NPTv6-only home networks >On Feb 22, 2013, at 10:01 AM, Michael Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: >> Right now, I don't think that sufficient energy is being given to just >>one obvious problem: how does real DNS interact with >> prefix delegation in the home (assuming that we don't want split >>horizon dns)? For that matter, let me be even more blunt: >> I don't think that real DNS is being given enough attention altogether >>in home settings, and until that happens we'll >> just inherit all of the awful hacks that are done with NATv4. > >Agreed. I'm delighted to hear that Simon has a hack in dnamasq that >addresses this problem in a dual-stack environment, but I want to have a >serious conversation somewhere about how to address the problem on the >v6-only homenet. > >Who's interested in sketching a DNS-based solution to the problem and has >time to work on it? > _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
