I'm not on the home net list and I need another list like I need a hole in the head.
However, I think section 3.4.1 is reasonably well written. I think it would be good if the following were added: ISPs are strongly encouraged to issue /48s to residential customers whenever requested or hinted by the home gateway. Also, it appears that section 3.4.1 assumes a custom will change ISPs by disconnecting provider A and then connecting provider B. It does not appear to make a provision for connecting provider B and having a period of transition with dual prefixes. This possibility should be considered and addressed, IMHO. Owen On Feb 27, 2013, at 5:56 AM, Tim Chown <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 26 Feb 2013, at 14:07, "Brzozowski, John" > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> [jjmb] incorrect I have both, just stating that I have both. Apologies if >> I was not clear. I also have a good # of home routers actively using IPv6 >> enabled broadband today, ~3%. > > Congratulations, btw. That must be a large number when converted to real > customers :) > > The homenet architecture assumes a CPE rather than a single host. It > discusses ISP allocations in section 3.4.1 of > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-homenet-arch-07. As that text is in > WGLC, any comments on that section would be welcome (preferably on the > homenet list). > > Tim > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
