On 3/5/13 9:00 PM, "Mark Townsley" <[email protected]> wrote: > >If Homenet is going to use the CER_ID, we need to agree on the use of it >here. DHC is there largely to make sure it's formatted correctly and >such, >not "semantic content".
Thanks for the clarification Mark, I misunderstood that relationship. It sounds like we may need to present/discuss the CER_ID draft in the future, if there is interest in pursuing it within homenet. Cheers, ~Chris > >http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dhc/charter/: > > >"Generally speaking, the DHC WG will not be responsible for evaluating >the >semantic content of proposed options. Similarly, the ownership of >specifications >typically belongs the relevant working group that needs more >functionality from >DHCP, not the DHC WG. The DHC WG coordinates reviews of the proposed >options together with those working groups. It is required that those >working groups have consensus to take on the work and that the work is >within their charter." > > >- Mark > > >_______________________________________________ >homenet mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet > > > > > _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
