On 11 Mar 2013, at 12:45, Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mar 11, 2013, at 1:31 AM, H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> wrote: >> That doesn't give the option to the server, though... the client has to ask >> for one or the other. > > What I would suggest is that if the client doesn't get a big enough > allocation, it request an additional allocation, rather than that it try to > anticipate what the server will return and prepare for the worst.
I agree with Ran's original comments. These are reinforced in the candidate -08 text. Are there IPv6 ISPs out there who would allocate an additional (say) /60 if the CER requested an additional prefix? Would it not be simpler to state that the prefix in use in the homenet from any ISP should be contiguous, and sufficient in size for the homenet's requirement, as per 6177 (which recommends "significantly more than a single /64"?) Tim _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
