On 03/14/2013 04:15 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:45:22PM -0700, Michael Thomas wrote:
The problem here is that you actually believe this.
Stuart's description certainly matches what I have observed. What is
it you thought was false? Note that he went out of his way to use
Apple examples, so the cross-vendor issues that plague this sort of
behaviour aren't an issue. (I'd like that not to be true, of course,
but that's not directly relevant to SD issues.)
The assertion that it is "common". It isn't. It's a way to amaze
your friends. It's also irksome that "common" assumes a uniformity
of i's and airs as you mention. There is no inevitability to the status
quo, and we shouldn't proceed from that assumption. We should get
on with the job of defining requirements for the long run.
Mike
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
