Ole Troan <[email protected]> wrote:
>[...]
>
>> We have switched to RA-Handling in userspace for similar reasons
>already so I guess it's only the next logical step to create separate
>routing tables for each upstream interface to do source-based routing
>and filter out ULA-traffic on this layer instead of through iptables.
>
>don't do it per upstream interface, that wouldn't work. per next-hop
>might. the draft suggests a single table with source constrained
>routers and backtracking.
>
Ah yes thanks for the hint. Please correct me if I got this wrong: I guess per
interface would be problematic if there are multiple routers on the upstream
link offering different prefixes. However in case of prefix delegation via
DHCPV6-pd like on usual home ISP connections would it not be problematic to
attribute the prefix to any specific router? - if there would be multiple
routers which I guess is unlikely in that situation. One could maybe attribute
the prefix to the source address of the DHCPv6 server but that sounds
problematic to me aswell. Hmm did I miss something or am I completely on the
wrong track now?
Thanks,
Steven
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
