Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jul 5, 2013, at 9:18 AM, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> > wrote: >> To the extent that one sees two DHCP servers because one has two >> interfaces, MIF has some solutions.
> Right, MIF is working on dealing with the issue of multiple
> provisioning domains on the same wire as well. Don't mistake the name
> for the referent.
Yes, but... it falls outside of the minimal-changes-to-hosts bin.
While hosts with multiple interfaces have a clear incentive to deploy
MIF-solutions (and the people who sell the 3G/LTE often control the host),
it isn't clear to me that a host with one physical interface (having only the
untagged VLAN configured), has any knowledge or incentive to deploy MIF.
Does the DHCPv6 spec what a host is supposed to do if it gets two answers when
it
does DHCPv6?
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
pgpH7jfsPoFt9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
