Athanasios Douitsis <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Michael,
> When I said "problematic" yesterday, I meant problematic for the
delegating
> router. If the other side (requesting router - CPE) is not
exclude-capable then
> is it not illegal for the delegating router to delegate a prefix and at
the
> same time use part of it to enumerate one its interfaces? So a set of
> attributes where the Framed-IPv6-Prefix is contained in the
> Delegated-IPv6-Prefix may result in error.
How could a BNG know if the requesting router is exclude capable?
Would this by having the option in the DHCPv6 Request list?
If the WAN was numbered by RA, then I guess the DHCPv6 server would have to
do the split prefix in half trick.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
pgpmAqYGTkPyr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
