>>> Could it be separate (existing) protocol? >> >> if one had existed, sure. >> requirements from homenet-arch (I might have missed some): >> - must support multi-homing >> - each link should be assigned a stable prefix >> - efficient allocation of prefixes >> - should support both IPv4 and IPv6 > > I meant this: > > loosely coupled ---- separate (existing DHCPv6-PD) protocol triggering > route updates to the routing protocol.
yes, DHCP PD comes up as a proposed solution quite frequently. I just don't see how you can make DHCP PD fulfill the requirements. cheers, Ole
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
