>>> I can see reasons for having shared sub-layer for routing protocol and >>> prefix distribution protocol. As example, in MANET we have such already: >>> RFC 5444 and 5498. If we define a set of TLVs for border router information >>> and prefix distribution, it can run on whatever routing protocol. Don't >>> forget BGP. >>> >>> For Homenet plug&play, I don't suggest to let configure grandma her >>> favorite IGP ;) >> >> doesn't that mean we have to pick one? > > At least one, for Homenet. Could be OSPF for high speed links, RPL for LLN, > or OLSRv2 for mix of wireless and wired links including ad hoc radio links. > > There is something common on prefix distribution in Homenet, small > office/home office networks, branch office networks, ad hoc networks and even > in enterprise / campus networks. The prefix distribution protocol could be a > single protocol. We better not try to converge to a single routing protocol.
how do you do a self-organizing / zero-conf network without making a choice? cheers, Ole
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
