>> Given N*10^8+ (conservative estimate, N some single digit probably) 
>> potential homenet hosts already out there and 0 homenet routers, designing 
>> with the assumption that ‘yeah, hosts can change’ doesn’t sound too 
>> reasonable to me.
>> 
>> Then again, what’s wrong with fighting windmills?
> 
> We're talking about prefix delegation.   Prefix delegation runs on routers, 
> not hosts.

actually, we're talking about prefix assignment. which may be splitting hairs, 
but isn't quite the same as prefix delegation.

cheers,
Ole

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to