On 19 Feb 2014, at 01:50, Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:

> "Some specific transition technologies which may be deployed by the   
> homenet's ISP are discussed in [RFC1918]."

Whoops. I smell a cut and paste slip when adding a ref to the recently 
published RFC7084!

> That gave me a good laugh.

It could be interesting to deliberately add such things to test who's really 
read a give document thoroughly :)

Tim

> 
> Regards
>   Brian
> 
> 
> On 15/02/2014 07:21, Tim Chown wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> For info, this draft is intended to address any remaining IESG comments.  
>> Emails have been sent to the ADs in question with the chairs copied.  We 
>> hope that any remaining DISCUSSes can be cleared before London.
>> 
>> Tim
>> 
>> On 14 Feb 2014, at 18:17, [email protected] wrote:
>> 
>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
>>> directories.
>>> This draft is a work item of the Home Networking Working Group of the IETF.
>>> 
>>>       Title           : IPv6 Home Networking Architecture Principles
>>>       Authors         : Tim Chown
>>>                         Jari Arkko
>>>                         Anders Brandt
>>>                         Ole Troan
>>>                         Jason Weil
>>>     Filename        : draft-ietf-homenet-arch-12.txt
>>>     Pages           : 52
>>>     Date            : 2014-02-14
>>> 
>>> Abstract:
>>>  This text describes evolving networking technology within residential
>>>  home networks with increasing numbers of devices and a trend towards
>>>  increased internal routing.  The goal of this document is to define a
>>>  general architecture for IPv6-based home networking, describing the
>>>  associated principles, considerations and requirements.  The text
>>>  briefly highlights specific implications of the introduction of IPv6
>>>  for home networking, discusses the elements of the architecture, and
>>>  suggests how standard IPv6 mechanisms and addressing can be employed
>>>  in home networking.  The architecture describes the need for specific
>>>  protocol extensions for certain additional functionality.  It is
>>>  assumed that the IPv6 home network is not actively managed, and runs
>>>  as an IPv6-only or dual-stack network.  There are no recommendations
>>>  in this text for the IPv4 part of the network.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-homenet-arch/
>>> 
>>> There's also a htmlized version available at:
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-homenet-arch-12
>>> 
>>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-homenet-arch-12
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> homenet mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
>> 

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to