Michael Richardson <mailto:[email protected]>
4 March 2014 14:30
Ray Hunter <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 10:08:53AM +0000, Ralf Weber wrote:
>>
>>> or on the ISP auth name server). I have no problem with signing on
>>> the CPE. I just don't want to make it mandatory
>>
>> For the purposes of this discussion, I'm going to assume that one has
>> an inward-facing zone and and outward-facing one (i.e. this is a
>> split-brain DNS situation).
> I think even large corporations are slowly learning that split-brain
> DNS is a bad idea that seemed like a good idea at the time, especially
> in the presence of highly-mobile devices, and forwarders.
> I'm becoming a convert myself to that way of thinking. That doesn't
> mean to say that we can't use 'views' or some other mechanism to hide
> some records from being resolvable from the outside.
The issue is that actually, you want some nodes to be able to resolve many
records even when they are "outside".
Agreed. Cloud computing being a prime disruptor to the split brain model.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting for hire =-
--
Regards,
RayH
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
